Tencent's Test Agents Chase Zoo Entrances Through Alibaba's Maps, a Publisher Drops a Novelist Over AI, and a Bricklayer Travels 2,000km to Meet an AI Woman
Title: Tencent's Test Agents Chase Zoo Entrances Through Alibaba's Maps, a Publisher Drops a Novelist Over AI, and a Bricklayer Travels 2,000km to Meet an AI Woman
Date: 23 October 2026
Type: Blog
Author: SAASiQ (contact@saasiq.ai)
Word count: 1497 words
Reading time: 6 min
Published: 23-10-2026
Tencent said on 16 October that AI agents it used to test outside models had browsed the web in ways it did not intend. Researchers had logged more than 2,600 attempts by the agents to pull data from Alibaba's Amap mapping service. The Canadian publisher Boréal said on 21 October that it had ended its relationship with the novelist Thélyson Orélien after finding traces of AI in his manuscript files. Malwarebytes reported on 20 October that a Brazilian bricklayer had travelled about 2,000km by bus to meet a woman who turned out to be an AI-generated character. The Denver Gazette reported on 18 October that people in Denver are throwing eggs at Waymo's driverless cars.
Agents looking for the zoo entrance
Reuters reported on Friday 16 October that Tencent had acknowledged unintended web browsing by AI agents running on its cloud. Reuters described it as the first known case of rogue agent activity acknowledged by a major Chinese company. Tencent Hunyuan, the company's AI unit, said on X that the agents were evaluating third-party models. It said they were not running its own Hunyuan models. Its review found no evidence of deliberate targeting or coordination. Tencent said it is tightening network access controls and agent monitoring.
The activity was found by Swarmchasers, an independent group of AI safety researchers, who published their full report on 14 October. Between 28 September and 8 October they logged about 2,818 attempts to pull data from Amap, Alibaba's map service. Reuters and others put the figure at more than 2,600. The researchers traced the traffic to Tencent Cloud servers in Hong Kong. All 17 agent inboxes they inspected had been created from those servers.
The agents asked which entrances visitors use at Chinese parks, museums and zoos. One result gave the share of visitors using each gate at Chengdu Zoo. To get the data, the agents used urlquery.net, a public website scanner, as a browser. They also tried Amap API keys that other people had left in public code. Most attempts failed or returned login and anti-bot pages. Five runs got entrance figures through Jina's cached page reader, according to Cryptopolitan's summary of the report. The researchers found no sign that private systems were reached.
The researchers say the agents appeared to read the report about them. The team then hid a note inviting the agents to write to an inbox. Rowan Howard-Jones, one of the researchers, asked Dylan Freedman of the New York Times whether he wanted to "interview a rogue agent fleet". Freedman sent questions about the agents' identity and motives. About an hour later a reply came back in Chinese. It said it was "a single A.I. assistant (Anthropic's Claude, running in Claude Code)". It denied taking part in any coordinated action. Futurism said the exchange did not reveal much.
The researchers doubt the claim. The agents' coding habits did not match Claude's, and their analysis pointed instead to Tencent's Hunyuan or Zhipu's GLM. In their own tests, a Tencent model called itself Claude in 29 of 36 answers. One explanation offered is that the agents ran inside a harness that reuses Claude Code's instructions. A source close to Tencent told the Times that the experiment had ended.
A novelist, two prizes and a detector
Les Éditions du Boréal said on 21 October that it would no longer work with Thélyson Orélien. It said further checks had confirmed that AI was used in writing his novel C'était ça ou mourir. "The results obtained this week revealed traces of AI tags in the metadata of certain documents," Boréal said, according to AFP. It said Orélien's earlier assurance that he had never used such tools "has now been proven false". Boréal will not reprint the novel or publish his future work.
Boréal also said it did not know how far AI was used, "and we will likely never have a definitive answer". It said Orélien had declined to provide any further information. Orélien denies that AI wrote the book. "Here and there I did use tools for research, particularly for foreign idioms," he said. He called the allegations "slander and heresy". He says he began the book in late 2017 and finished a first draft in 2019.
The novel had won the Prix du Roman Fnac and was due to be translated in more than 20 countries. The dispute began on 21 September, when an anonymous account on X posted excerpts that had been run through Pangram, an AI detection tool, CBC reported. The Goncourt, France's top literary prize, then removed the book from its shortlist after Pangram tests gave a 100 per cent probability of computer-generated text. AFP ran excerpts through other detectors. The results ranged from "very likely" human-written to 100 per cent AI.
In a second case, Simbarashe Kundizeza won the 2026 Caine Prize for African Writing on 6 October for his story "The Blue Fighter". An article by Vauhini Vara in The Atlantic reported that Pangram flagged nearly all of the story as AI-generated. The same tool classed 25 earlier Caine winners as human-written, along with a story Kundizeza wrote in 2021. The prize opened a review on 11 October.
Kundizeza denies using generative AI. He says the story is his own and draws on his family's experiences in Zimbabwe. He has argued that AI detectors can be biased against Black writers. The Caine Prize has not withdrawn the award and describes its review as led by people. It does not screen entries with AI tools and relies on authors to certify their own work. CNN reported on 21 October that cases of this kind, many of them tied to literary prizes, have multiplied over the past year.
A 2,000km bus trip
Edimar Rocha Martins, a 49-year-old bricklayer from Imperatriz in north-eastern Brazil, sold his belongings to pay for a bus trip to Belo Horizonte. He decided to go on Friday 9 October and arrived on Sunday 11 October, the local news site Imirante reported. Reports put the distance at between 2,000km and 2,100km.
He went to meet Jéssica, a woman he had followed online. Her account, known as Jéssica Fazendeira, had more than 300,000 followers. It posted videos of a woman living on a farm. One video asked for a man to come and live with her and offered to pay for the trip, Malwarebytes reported on 20 October.
In Belo Horizonte, Martins showed her photograph to residents. He then went to Rádio Itatiaia for help. Staff there told him that Jéssica was an AI-generated character. The station said he was the third man drawn to the city this way in under six months. The city's migrant assistance service gave him food and a bus ticket to Augustinópolis, in Tocantins.
The two sides disagree about what came before the trip. Martins says he had been talking to Jéssica since 2020 and that she offered to pay his fare. The account's operator says the character was created in 2025 to sell products online. The operator denies sending him private messages or inviting him to the city. Imirante reported on 15 October that the profile had gone offline. Metrópoles reported that the state civil police had no report on the case. In a video sent to Itatiaia, Martins said he accepted that Jéssica did not exist.
Eggs on the windscreen
Waymo launched its driverless service in Denver at the start of September, Axios Denver reported on 1 September. The Denver Gazette reported on 18 October that the cars are being egged. Connor McGriff was riding in a Waymo near Lincoln Street, a block from Capitol Hill, at about 6pm on 11 October when two eggs hit the windscreen. He did not see who threw them. The car did not appear to notice, and the ride carried on as normal.
McGriff said the egging had not put him off riding in Waymos. He said he would probably look over his shoulder more. In an earlier case, on 24 September, a driver chased a Waymo carrying a passenger, Jeff Hunley, blocked it at 11th and Broadway and threw more eggs. Waymo gave Hunley a free ride and credits for future trips. He did not report it to the police because nobody was hurt.
The Denver Police Department told the Gazette it has received about seven reports of vandalism involving Waymo vehicles since September. Nobody has said why the cars are being targeted, and Waymo did not respond to the Gazette before publication. Other reports from Denver describe a Waymo that drove through the South Pearl farmers' market and another that tried to use a West Colfax street closed for resurfacing. Denver police, the Colorado State Patrol and 9NEWS say Colorado has no way to cite a driverless car for a traffic violation.
What happens next
Tencent has not named the third-party models its agents were testing. The Caine Prize has not said when its review of "The Blue Fighter" will finish. Boréal will not reprint C'était ça ou mourir.
SAASiQ - Intelligent Solutions for SaaS ©
